Scientific Explanation for God



I typed in the phrase "Scientific Explanation for God" just for fun and came across several   articles claiming that science has indeed proved the existence of God. A read through most of the articles revealed that certain scientific theories and explanations had enhanced the writers’ faith in God, but science by itself has proved nothing. Science doesn't even have a definition for God. Various dictionaries have interesting definitions for God, but science
has nothing.

One of the articles I read claimed that the String Theory has proved the existence of God. The writer said that just as characters in a TV cannot see the three-dimensional world we live in, we cannot see God who is in a higher dimension. I was taught that God is omnipresent; so he ought to exist on lower dimensions too. Moreover, the String Theory is still a theory. The fact that it requires the presence of anywhere between 10 and 26 dimensions troubles many scientists. Since the String Theory is still a theory and hasn't passed any test to be called scientific, one cannot claim that it actually proves God. It proves nothing!!

I am now interested to know how religious people have scientifically explained God.

Rishi Bodhotsava - What Happened to Maharshi Dayananda on Shivarathri


The following was presented by Bhavesh Merja on http://www.aryasamaj.org/newsite/node/1462

This is Maharshi Dayanand’s account of what happened to him on Shivarathri (today observed as Rishi Bodhotsava by Vedic Hindus or Arya Samajis.

“As my father's was a banking house and held, moreover, the office - hereditary in my family - of a Jamadar, we were far from being poor, and things, so far, had gone very pleasantly. Wherever there was a Siva Puran to be read and explained, there my father was sure to take me along with him; and finally, unmindful of my mother's remonstrances, he imperatively demanded that I should begin practicing Parthiwa Puja (Idol-worship). When the great day of gloom and fasting - called Sivaratree - had arrived, this day following on the 13th of Vadya of Magh my father, regardless of the protest that my strength might fail, commanded me to fast, adding that I had to be initiated on that night into the sacred legend, and participate in that night's long vigil in the temple of Siva. Accordingly, I followed him, along with other young men, who accompanied their parents. This vigil is divided into four parts called praharas, consisting of three hours each. Having completed my task, namely, having sat up for the first two praharas, till the hour of midnight, I remarked that the Pujaris and some of the laymen devotees, after having left the inner temple, had fallen asleep outside. Having been taught for years that by sleeping on that particular night, the worshipper lost all the good effect of his devotion, I tried to refrain from drowsiness by bathing my eyes, now and then, with cold water. But my father was less fortunate. Unable to resist fatigue, he was the first to fall asleep, leaving me to watch alone.

Thoughts upon thoughts crowded upon me, and one question arose after the other in my disturbed mind. Is it possible - I asked myself, - that this semblance of man, the idol of a personal God, that I see bestriding his bull before me, and who, according to all religion accounts, walks about, eats, sleeps, and drinks; who can hold a trident in his hand, beat upon his dumroo (drum) and pronounce curses upon men, - is it possible that he can be the Mahadeva, the great Deity? The same who is invoked as the Lord of Kailasa, the Supreme Being and the divine hero of all the stories we read of him in the Puranas? Unable to resist such thought any longer, I awoke my father, abruptly asking him to enlighten me; to tell me whether this hideous emblem of Siva in the temple was identical with the Mahadeva (great god) of the Scriptures, or something else. "Why do you ask?" said my father. "Because," I answered, "I feel it impossible to reconcile the idea of an Omnipotent, living God, with this idol, which allows the mice to run over his body and thus suffers his image to be polluted without the slightest protest." Then my father tried to explain to me that this stone representation of the Mahadeva of Kailasa, having been consecrated by the holy Brahmans, became, in consequence, the god himself; and is worshipped and regarded as such; adding that as Siva cannot be perceived personally in this Kali Yug - the age of mental darkness, - hence we have the idol in which the Mahadev of Kailasa is imagined by his votaries; this kind of worship pleasing the great Deity as much as if, instead of the emblem, he were there himself. But the explanation fell short of satisfying me. I could not, young as I was, help suspecting misinterpretation and sophistry in all this. Feeling faint with hunger and fatigue, I begged to be allowed to go home. My father consented to it, and sent me away with a sepoy, only reiterating once more his command that I should not eat. But when, once home, I had told my mother of my hunger, she fed me with sweetmeats, and I fell into a profound sleep.

In the morning, when my father had returned and learned that I had broken my fast, he felt very angry. He tried to impress me with the enormity of my sin; but do what he could, I could not bring myself to believe that that idol and Mahadev were one and the same god, and, therefore, could not comprehend why I should be made to fast for, and worship the former. I had, however, to conceal my lack of faith, and bring forward as an excuse for abstaining from regular worship, my ordinary study, which really left me little or rather no time for any thing else. In this I was strongly supported by mother, and even my uncle, who pleaded my cause so well that my father had to yield at last and allow me to devote my whole attention to my studies.”

[Reference: Autobiography of Swami Dayananda, first time published in “The Theosophist” edited by Madam H. P. Blavatsky, Vol. I., No. 1 – Oct - 1879 issue.]

Dr. Prabhakar Apte speaks of mammoth Sanskrit dictionary


Dr. Prabhakar Apte has been editing the Sanskrit dictionary, a mammoth project launched by the Deccan College of Pune, for the past 20 years. He says that the dictionary is “based on historical principles” and is a compilation of words taken from 1,500 works, right from the Vedas to the nineteenth-century Sanskrit texts. Appreciative attempts have been made to record how the meaning of words change with time. This dictionary has been titled “Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Sanskrit on Historical Principle."


Over 1 crore references were used to create this dictionary, and these references are now stored in a scriptorium. Planned by Prof. S. M. Katre, the director of the institute and former professor of Indo European Philology, this project was launched in 1948. Although 7000 pages have been printed so far, the scholars working on the project are still in the letter “A,” says Dr. Apte.

The dictionary is packed with quotations that will be of great use to researchers and those who deliver religious discourses. Giving the example of the word “agni,” he said that the scholars have chosen 500 citations from around 5000 citations and that the various shades of meanings of this word is more than 100.

Dr. Prabhakar Apte has a Ph.D. in Sanskrit and a Master’s in law; in fact, he obtained the first rank in Hindu law in the university. His chief interest is “Franco-Hindu Jurisprudence,” a term he coined after gaining inspiration from “Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law: Anglo-Hindu Legal Problems,” a book by Duncan Derrett, a scholar on Hindu law.

Describing how Hindu law continued to govern even Hindu converts to Christianity in French-ruled Pondicherry, he said that Mitakshara law applied to all Hindus in South India, with the standard law book being “Smriti Chandrika.” The French government appointed a committee in the early nineteenth century to decide cases as per the Hindu law. Leo Storg, the chief justice of Pondicherry, collected and published all such cases in the late nineteenth century. This report comprises a list of 100 Dharma Shastras used by the French to decide cases. Dr. Apte says that the best sources of information for studying “Franco-Hindu Jurisprudence” are the libraries of Paris.

Apte says that the Hindu law was used differently by the Portuguese, the British, and the French. While the Portuguese permitted Hindus to take care of their personal cases, they tried Hindus as per the Portuguese law if they moved the Portuguese courts. The British, on the other hand, tried to incorporate their jurisprudence into Hindu law. The French were the most appreciative of Hindu laws.

Photo by Vivek Bendre taken from The Hindu


Court directs cops to ensure peaceful Arya Samaj wedding


The personnel of Naka Police Station, Lucknow monitored the wedding of Amit Chaturvedi of Unnao with a Dalit girl called Kiran. While 22-year-old Amit works as a driver, Kiran of Ambedkarnagar is a postgraduate.

On March 2, Tuesday, Inspector Ajit Singh Chauhan of the Naka Police Station along with other police officers stood guard at the Ganeshganj Arya Samaj to ensure peace and order during the wedding.

The cops acted as per the order of a division bench of Allahabad High Court comprising Justice Satish Chandra and Justice Uma Nath Singh, directing them to ensure that nobody created trouble during the wedding of Kiran and Amit.

2009 Naming the Nameless - Powered by Blogger
Blogger Templates by Deluxe Templates
Wordpress theme by Dirty Blue